|
List of contributing authors |
11 |
|
|
Introduction |
16 |
|
|
1 Philosophical Accounts of Vagueness, Fuzzy Poverty Measures and Multidimensionality |
23 |
|
|
1.1 Introduction |
23 |
|
|
2 The Mathematical Framework of Fuzzy Logic |
43 |
|
|
2.1 Introduction |
43 |
|
|
2.2.1 Fuzzy propositions |
44 |
|
|
2.2.2 Fuzzy subsets, fuzzy numbers |
45 |
|
|
2.3 The connectors of fuzzy logic |
47 |
|
|
2.3.1 Zadeh's operators |
47 |
|
|
2.3.2 Other fuzzy logical connectives |
52 |
|
|
2.4 Decision-making and evaluation in a fuzzy context |
55 |
|
|
2.4.1 Optimal fuzzy decision: the Bellman and Zadeh's model |
55 |
|
|
2.4.2 "Fuzzy" aggregation in evaluation problems. |
56 |
|
|
References |
60 |
|
|
3 An Axiomatic Approach to IVIultidimensional Poverty IVIeasurement via Fuzzy Sets |
62 |
|
|
3.1 Introduction |
62 |
|
|
3.2 Fuzzy Membership Function |
65 |
|
|
3.3 Properties for a Fuzzy Multidimensional Poverty Index |
69 |
|
|
3.4 The Subgroup Decomposable Fuzzy Multidimensional Poverty |
74 |
|
|
3.5 Conclusions |
80 |
|
|
References |
82 |
|
|
4 On the Convergence of Various Unidimensional Approaches |
86 |
|
|
4.1 Introduction |
86 |
|
|
4.2 Basic components of the unidimensional approach |
87 |
|
|
4.3 The choice of definition and the scope of poverty |
91 |
|
|
4.3.1 Impact of the weighting procedures |
91 |
|
|
4.3.2 Impact of the economic well-being variables |
92 |
|
|
4.4 Choice of definition and identification of the poor |
95 |
|
|
4.4.1 Looking at the poorest quintile |
95 |
|
|
4.4.2 The population defined as poor |
98 |
|
|
4.4.3 Identifying the poor according to more than two distributions |
100 |
|
|
4.5 Concluding comments |
101 |
|
|
5 Capability Approach and Fuzzy Set Theory: Description, Aggregation and Inference Issues |
105 |
|
|
5.1 Introduction |
105 |
|
|
5.2 Brief remarks on distinctive features of the capability approach |
107 |
|
|
5.3 Describing multidimensional poverty and well-being through fuzzy membership functions |
110 |
|
|
5.4 Aggregating well-being dimensions through fuzzy operators |
117 |
|
|
5.5 Assessing multidimensional well-being through fuzzy inference systems |
120 |
|
|
5.6 Conclusion |
123 |
|
|
References |
124 |
|
|
6 Multidimensional and Longitudinal Poverty: an Integrated Fuzzy Approach |
126 |
|
|
6.1 Introduction |
126 |
|
|
6.2 Income poverty |
128 |
|
|
6.3 Non-monetary deprivation ("Fuzzy Supplementary") |
131 |
|
|
6.4 Fuzzy set operations appropriate for the analysis of poverty and deprivation |
133 |
|
|
6.4.1 Multidimensional measures |
133 |
|
|
6.4.2 Definition of poverty measures according to both monetary and non-monetary dimensions |
134 |
|
|
6.4.3 Income poverty and non-monetary deprivation in combination: IVIanifest and Latent deprivation |
138 |
|
|
6.5 On longitudinal analysis of poverty conceptualized as a fuzzy state |
139 |
|
|
6.5.1 Longitudinal application of the Composite fuzzy operation |
139 |
|
|
6.5.2 The general procedure |
140 |
|
|
6.6 Application to specific situations |
143 |
|
|
6.6.1 Persistence of poverty |
143 |
|
|
6.6.2 Rates of exit and re-entry |
145 |
|
|
6.7 Concluding remarks |
146 |
|
|
References |
146 |
|
|
7 French Poverty Measures using Fuzzy Set Approaches |
149 |
|
|
7.1 Introduction |
149 |
|
|
7.2 Application of tiie TFR approach using data from the French Surveys on Living Conditions for the years 1986 and 1993 |
150 |
|
|
7.3 Statistical sensitivity analysis of the TFR poverty index on the number of attributes |
154 |
|
|
7.4 Extracting a law from multidimensional poverty scores analogous to the Pareto Law for income distribution: a method based on the TFR approach |
155 |
|
|
7.5 Concluding comments |
161 |
|
|
References |
162 |
|
|
Appendix: List of deprivation indicators selected from the INSEE-French Surveys of Living Conditions 1986 and 1993 |
163 |
|
|
8 The "Fuzzy Set" Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Analysis: Using the Shapley Decomposition to Analyze the Determinants of Poverty in Israel |
165 |
|
|
8.1 Introduction |
165 |
|
|
8.2 Theoretical Background |
166 |
|
|
8.3 The Case of Israel in 1995 |
167 |
|
|
8.3.1 Selecting the Indicators |
167 |
|
|
8.3.2 The Data Sources |
168 |
|
|
8.3.3 Computing the percentage of poor according to the various approaches |
168 |
|
|
8.3.4 The Determinants of multi-dimensional poverty |
169 |
|
|
8.3.5 The Shapley Approach to Index Decomposition and its Implications for Multidimensional Poverty Analysis |
178 |
|
|
8.4 Concluding Comments |
180 |
|
|
Bibliography |
181 |
|
|
Appendix: List of Variables available in the 1995 Israeli Census |
182 |
|
|
9 Multidimensional Fuzzy Set Approach Poverty Estimates in Romania |
185 |
|
|
9.1 Introduction |
185 |
|
|
9.2 Socio-economic and demographic context |
186 |
|
|
9.3 Monetary dimension of poverty |
189 |
|
|
9.3.1 National method |
189 |
|
|
9.3.2 Relative method |
192 |
|
|
9.4 Multidimensional estimation of poverty |
193 |
|
|
9.4.1 Poverty and occupationat status |
194 |
|
|
9.4.2 Poverty and education |
196 |
|
|
9.4.3 Poverty and demographic characteristics of households |
196 |
|
|
9.4.4 Territorial distribution of poverty |
198 |
|
|
9.5 Conclusions |
199 |
|
|
References |
204 |
|
|
10 Multidimensional and Fuzzy Poverty in Switzerland |
205 |
|
|
10.1 Introduction |
205 |
|
|
10.2 Poverty in Switzerland |
206 |
|
|
10.3 Decompositions of poverty |
211 |
|
|
10.3.1 Poverty by employment status |
212 |
|
|
10.3.2 Poverty by household composition |
215 |
|
|
10.4 Concluding remarks |
217 |
|
|
References |
218 |
|
|
11 A Comparison of Poverty According to Primary Goods, Capabilities and Outcomes. Evidence from Frencli School Leavers' Surveys |
220 |
|
|
11.1 Introduction |
220 |
|
|
11.2 Three concepts of poverty |
221 |
|
|
11.2.1 Clarifying basic features |
221 |
|
|
11.2.1 Describing connections between tlie three concepts |
224 |
|
|
11.3 A multidimensional measure of poverty: the fuzzy logic |
225 |
|
|
11.3.1 Data processing: income, qualitative and continuous indicators |
227 |
|
|
11.3.2 The proposed membership function |
229 |
|
|
11.3.3 Example: calculation of a composite membership function |
230 |
|
|
11.4 Empirical comparison on French Youth Panel Survey from 1996 to 1999 |
231 |
|
|
11.4.1 Preliminaries |
231 |
|
|
11.4.2 The informational basis of primary goods |
232 |
|
|
11.4.3 The informational basis of primary social outcomes |
234 |
|
|
11.4.4 The informational basis of refined functionings |
235 |
|
|
11.4.5 Analyse recovery of the three populations |
236 |
|
|
11.5 Conclusion |
238 |
|
|
Appendix 1 - The CEREQ Panel Data Surveys |
238 |
|
|
Appendix 2 - French Educational Level |
239 |
|
|
References |
239 |
|
|
12 Multidimensional Fuzzy Relative Poverty Dynamic Measures in Poland |
241 |
|
|
12.1 Introduction |
241 |
|
|
12.2 Sources of Data |
242 |
|
|
12.3 Methods of Analysis |
243 |
|
|
12.3.1 Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty |
243 |
|
|
12.3.2 Evaluation of the Poverty Nature |
247 |
|
|
12.3.3 Poverty Determinants |
249 |
|
|
12.4 Changes in the Poverty Sphere in Poland from 1996 to 1999 |
250 |
|
|
12.4.1 Degree of the Poverty Threat |
250 |
|
|
12.4.2 Poverty Nature |
253 |
|
|
12.4.3 Poverty Determinants |
256 |
|
|
12.5 Summary |
261 |
|
|
References |
262 |
|
|
13 Modelling Fuzzy and Multidimensional Poverty Measures in the United Kingdom with Variance Components Panel Regression |
264 |
|
|
13.1 Introduction |
264 |
|
|
13.2 Fuzzy and multidimensional poverty definitions |
266 |
|
|
13.3 Panel regression models with variance components |
267 |
|
|
13.4 Cross-sectional empirical analysis |
269 |
|
|
13.5 Longitudinal empirical analysis |
271 |
|
|
13.5.1 Trend estimation |
273 |
|
|
13.5.2 The effect of covariates |
276 |
|
|
13.6 Concluding remarks |
280 |
|
|
References |
280 |
|
|
Index |
283 |
|