|
Preface |
5 |
|
|
Contents |
9 |
|
|
1. PlanningTheory: Reconstruction or Requiem? |
12 |
|
|
... A Certain Uneasiness about PlanningTheory” |
12 |
|
|
... HaveWe Improved the Clarity of Planning Methodology? |
13 |
|
|
... What Are the Reasons for the Deceiving Development of PlanningTheory? |
15 |
|
|
... PlanningTheory: General or Not? |
22 |
|
|
... A Vade-Mecum for Good Planners’ Professional Relations? |
23 |
|
|
... Deontology and Epistemology of the Profession |
25 |
|
|
2. In Search of Integration: The Past Negative Experience |
27 |
|
|
... Expectations and Results from the Integration of the Planning Sciences |
27 |
|
|
... The Bad Course of the Debate |
31 |
|
|
... Is a Positive Reconstruction of PlanningTheory Possible? |
32 |
|
|
3 Towards a New Uni.ed Discipline of Planning |
34 |
|
|
... The Fields of Activity |
34 |
|
|
... TheMerits and Limits of the Trans-Disciplinary Approach |
43 |
|
|
... Positivist”- Type Decision-Making Analysis |
44 |
|
|
... Social Reality is Subjective Reality |
45 |
|
|
... Voluntarist”- Type Decision-Making Analysis |
46 |
|
|
... A Defect of Approach or One of Further Elaboration? |
47 |
|
|
4. The First Routes of the New Discipline |
50 |
|
|
... Schemes of Procedure for the Preparation of Plans and the Construction of Suitable Accounting Frames” |
51 |
|
|
... Schemes of the Systemic Interrelationship Between Plan Levels |
52 |
|
|
... Institutional Procedures of Plan Bargaining” and Preference Consultation Systems |
53 |
|
|
... Information Systems for Planning and TheirManagement |
54 |
|
|
... Monitoring and Plan Evaluation Systems |
55 |
|
|
5. Some Integrative Topics of the New Planning Discipline |
56 |
|
|
... Integration Between (Conventional) Economic Accounting Systems and Social Accounting Systems |
57 |
|
|
... Integration Between Socio-Economic Planning ( and Related Accounting) and Technological Forecasting |
58 |
|
|
... Integration Between Socio-Economic Planning ( and Related Accounting) and Physical ( or Territorial or Environmental) Planning |
59 |
|
|
... Integration Between Socio-Economic (and Physical) Planning and Institutional Organisation and Negotiation |
59 |
|
|
... Integration Between Socio-Economic Planning and the Institutional Systemand Design |
60 |
|
|
... Concluding Remarks: The Planological Approach” |
61 |
|
|
6. Planning Science: Basic Postulates and Logical Framework for Reference |
63 |
|
|
... From Planning Theory” to Planning Science” |
63 |
|
|
... A reference Framework for Planning Science: Some Essential Postulates |
64 |
|
|
... The Planning Process |
70 |
|
|
... The Planning System |
71 |
|
|
... Conclusions |
80 |
|
|
7. The Future of National Planning Systems: Some New Steps |
81 |
|
|
... The Concept of National Planning” |
81 |
|
|
... National Planning in a Systemic Vision |
82 |
|
|
... What Opportunities Exist for the Systemic- Type Development of National Planning? |
83 |
|
|
... The American Federal Strategic Planning: Its E . ects on the National Planning Future |
87 |
|
|
... From Strategic Planning to National Economic Programming: A Necessary Step Towards Systemic Planning |
88 |
|
|
... Toward a Scienti. c and Professional Approach to the Systemic Planning |
89 |
|
|
8. Planning and Plan Evaluation: SomeWell- Known and Often Neglected Pitfalls |
91 |
|
|
... Logical Indeterminateness: Evaluation” vs Values” |
92 |
|
|
... Systemic Disconnectedness |
96 |
|
|
... Strategic Insubordination |
97 |
|
|
... Self-Referencing |
98 |
|
|
... Sub-Optimization |
100 |
|
|
... Bounded Rationality |
100 |
|
|
9. Conclusions |
105 |
|
|
... A question of Prepositions |
105 |
|
|
... A Question of Adjectivization” |
106 |
|
|
... The Rational” Approach Case and the Communicative” or Collaborative” One |
108 |
|
|
... The Diagonal of Planology” |
110 |
|
|
Bibliographical References |
113 |
|
|
Authors Index |
124 |
|
|
Analytical Index |
127 |
|