|
CONTENTS |
5 |
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS |
7 |
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
9 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION (Alice Crary) |
11 |
|
|
Part I WITTGENSTEIN’S LATER WRITINGS |
29 |
|
|
1 EXCURSUS ON WITTGENSTEIN’S VISION OF LANGUAGE (Stanley Cavell) |
31 |
|
|
Learning a word |
32 |
|
|
Projecting a word |
39 |
|
|
2 NON-COGNITIVISM AND RULE-FOLLOWING (John McDowell) |
48 |
|
|
Notes |
60 |
|
|
3 WITTGENSTEIN ON RULES AND PLATONISM (David H.Finkelstein) |
63 |
|
|
1 Rules and platonism: some preliminary remarks |
64 |
|
|
2 Wright’s “flat-footed response” to Kripke’s skeptic |
66 |
|
|
3 The gulf between an order and its execution |
71 |
|
|
4 Wittgenstein’s response to platonism |
76 |
|
|
Notes |
79 |
|
|
4 WHAT ‘THERE CAN BE NO SUCH THING AS MEANING ANYTHING BY ANY WORD’ COULD POSSIBLY MEAN (Rupert Read) |
84 |
|
|
Notes |
90 |
|
|
5 WITTGENSTEIN ON DECONSTRUCTION (Martin Stone) |
93 |
|
|
Introduction |
93 |
|
|
Part I Deconstruction |
95 |
|
|
Part II Deconstruction in Philosophical Investigations |
105 |
|
|
Part III How to read §201 |
110 |
|
|
Conclusion: notes on aligning Wittgenstein and Derrida |
118 |
|
|
Notes |
122 |
|
|
6 WITTGENSTEIN’S PHILOSOPHY IN RELATION TO POLITICAL THOUGHT (Alice Crary) |
128 |
|
|
1 Right-wing Wittgenstein, lefter-wing Wittgenstein |
129 |
|
|
(i) Wittgenstein as a conservative philosopher |
131 |
|
|
(ii) Saving Wittgenstein from conservatism (Richard Rorty) |
133 |
|
|
2 Bringing back “meaning” and “criticism” to their everyday use |
140 |
|
|
(i) Meaning and methods of checking truth |
141 |
|
|
(ii) Solving problems and making progress |
142 |
|
|
(iii) The “contingency” of concepts |
144 |
|
|
3 Conclusion: Wittgenstein’s philosophy in relation to political thought |
150 |
|
|
Notes |
151 |
|
|
Part II THE TRACTATUS AS FORERUNNER OF WITTGENSTEIN’S LATER WRITINGS |
157 |
|
|
7 ETHICS, IMAGINATION AND THE METHOD OF WITTGENSTEIN’S TRACTATUS (Cora Diamond) |
159 |
|
|
Notes |
182 |
|
|
8 ELUCIDATION AND NONSENSE IN FREGE AND EARLY WITTGENSTEIN (James Conant) |
184 |
|
|
1 The neglect of Frege? |
186 |
|
|
2 Frege on concept and object |
189 |
|
|
3 Fregean elucidation |
192 |
|
|
4 Elucidatory nonsense |
195 |
|
|
5 The Tractarian critique of the substantial conception |
199 |
|
|
6 The method of the Tractatus |
205 |
|
|
Notes |
208 |
|
|
9 RETHINKING MATHEMATICAL NECESSITY (Hilary Putnam) |
228 |
|
|
Kant and Frege |
229 |
|
|
Quine on analyticity |
230 |
|
|
It ain’t necessarily so |
232 |
|
|
Some thought experiments in On Certainty |
233 |
|
|
Quine’s philosophy of logic |
234 |
|
|
Kant-Frege-Wittgenstein (again) |
235 |
|
|
A few clarifications |
236 |
|
|
Arithmetic |
237 |
|
|
The existence of mathematical objects |
238 |
|
|
Notes |
239 |
|
|
10 WITTGENSTEIN, MATHEMATICS AND PHILOSOPHY (Juliet Floyd) |
242 |
|
|
Notes |
265 |
|
|
11 DOES BISMARCK HAVE A BEETLE IN HIS BOX? The private language argument in the Tractatus (Cora Diamond) |
272 |
|
|
Notes |
297 |
|
|
12 HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WOOD Wittgenstein, Frege and the problem of illogical thought (David R.Cerbone) |
303 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
303 |
|
|
2 Frege’s polemic against psychologism |
305 |
|
|
3 Wittgenstein’s examination of Frege’s polemics |
309 |
|
|
4 Wittgenstein’s quietism |
318 |
|
|
Notes |
319 |
|
|
13 CONCEPTIONS OF NONSENSE IN CARNAP AND WITTGENSTEIN (Edward Witherspoon) |
325 |
|
|
Introduction |
325 |
|
|
1 Carnap and Carnapianism |
327 |
|
|
2 Wittgenstein on nonsense |
331 |
|
|
3 Baker and Hacker: nonsense as a violation of rules of grammar |
335 |
|
|
4 Marie McGinn: Wittgenstein as a framework theorist |
343 |
|
|
5 The Incoherence of Carnapianism |
349 |
|
|
Notes |
355 |
|
|
A DISSENTING VOICE |
361 |
|
|
14 WAS HE TRYING TO WHISTLE IT? (P.M.S.Hacker) |
363 |
|
|
1 ‘A baffling doctrine, bafflingly presented’ |
363 |
|
|
2 A post-modernist defence |
366 |
|
|
3 Criticism of the post-modernist interpretation: the Tractatus—internal evidence |
370 |
|
|
(i) Sawing off the branch |
371 |
|
|
(ii) The rationale for the showing/saying distinction |
372 |
|
|
(iii) Diamond on the Tractatus |
373 |
|
|
(iv) The Tractatus—trying to say what can only be shown |
378 |
|
|
(v) The Tractatus criticisms of Frege and Russell |
378 |
|
|
(vi) The Tractatus conception of philosophy |
379 |
|
|
4 The post-modernist interpretation: external criticism |
381 |
|
|
(i) Pre-Tractatus writings |
381 |
|
|
(ii) Letters at the time of the Tractatus |
382 |
|
|
(iii) Discussions with friends |
383 |
|
|
(iv) The Aristotelian Society paper |
384 |
|
|
(v) Lectures and discussions |
386 |
|
|
(vi) The post-1929 manuscript volumes and typescripts |
388 |
|
|
Notes |
392 |
|
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY |
399 |
|
|
Primary sources |
399 |
|
|
Selected secondary sources |
400 |
|
|
INDEX |
405 |
|