|
Preface |
6 |
|
|
Contents |
9 |
|
|
Contributors |
13 |
|
|
Part I Comparing Countries and Regions |
17 |
|
|
1 E-government Maturity over 10 Years: A Comparative Analysis of E-government Maturity in Select Countries Around the World |
18 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
19 |
|
|
2 Background |
20 |
|
|
2.1 Stages of E-government |
21 |
|
|
3 Country Comparison |
23 |
|
|
3.1 Africa |
25 |
|
|
3.1.1 Kenya |
26 |
|
|
3.1.2 Nigeria |
26 |
|
|
3.2 Asia |
27 |
|
|
3.2.1 India |
27 |
|
|
3.2.2 Pakistan |
27 |
|
|
3.3 Australia |
28 |
|
|
3.3.1 Australia |
28 |
|
|
3.3.2 New Zealand |
28 |
|
|
3.4 Europe |
29 |
|
|
3.4.1 United Kingdom |
30 |
|
|
3.4.2 Germany |
30 |
|
|
3.5 North America |
31 |
|
|
3.5.1 United States |
31 |
|
|
3.5.2 Canada |
32 |
|
|
3.6 South America |
32 |
|
|
3.6.1 Argentina |
33 |
|
|
3.6.2 Brazil |
33 |
|
|
4 Emerging Trends in E-government |
33 |
|
|
5 Future Challenges for E-government |
34 |
|
|
6 Concluding Remarks |
35 |
|
|
References |
36 |
|
|
2 Framework of E-governance at the Local Government Level |
38 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
38 |
|
|
2 Background |
39 |
|
|
3 Main Thrust |
41 |
|
|
3.1 Observations |
51 |
|
|
3.1.1 Observations Related to Physical Infrastructure |
51 |
|
|
3.1.2 Observations Related to E-Government Frameworks |
53 |
|
|
4 Future E-governance Framework and Recommendations |
54 |
|
|
4.1 Proposed Framework |
56 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
56 |
|
|
References |
59 |
|
|
3 A Comparative Study of Contents of E-government Service Websites of Middle East and North African (MENA) Countries |
63 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
64 |
|
|
2 Background |
66 |
|
|
2.1 ICT in MENA Nations |
66 |
|
|
2.2 Digital Divide: An Undesired Outcome of Widespread ICTs in MENA Nations |
67 |
|
|
2.3 E-government for Better Governance in MENA Nations |
67 |
|
|
2.4 E-government Challenges Faced by MENA Nations |
68 |
|
|
2.5 Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in MENA Nations for E-government |
69 |
|
|
2.6 The Role of Comparative Research in MENA Countries' E-government Adoption |
70 |
|
|
3 Methods |
71 |
|
|
3.1 Sample of E-government Websites |
71 |
|
|
3.2 Data Analysis |
72 |
|
|
4 Results and Discussion |
72 |
|
|
4.1 Types of E-government Websites |
72 |
|
|
4.2 Types of Services |
75 |
|
|
4.3 Features Available on E-government Websites |
76 |
|
|
4.4 Online Executable Services |
77 |
|
|
4.5 Stages of Development of E-government Services |
77 |
|
|
4.6 E-government Indices for MENA Nations |
78 |
|
|
5 Conclusions and Recommendations |
79 |
|
|
5.1 Recommendations and Concluding Remarks |
79 |
|
|
References |
81 |
|
|
4 Towards E-participation in the Middle East and NorthernEurope |
84 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
85 |
|
|
2 Background |
85 |
|
|
3 E-participation in Egypt |
90 |
|
|
4 E-participation in Bahrain |
93 |
|
|
5 E-participation in Estonia |
94 |
|
|
6 E-participation in Finland |
96 |
|
|
7 Summary and Implications |
99 |
|
|
8 Conclusions and Future Directions |
100 |
|
|
References |
100 |
|
|
5 Evaluation of the Impact and Adoption of E-government Services in the Balkans |
104 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
105 |
|
|
2 E-government Services |
108 |
|
|
2.1 Sophistication of E-government Services |
108 |
|
|
2.2 Basket of E-services |
110 |
|
|
3 Fuzzy Numbers |
111 |
|
|
3.1 Linguistics and Fuzzy Set Theory |
111 |
|
|
3.2 Fuzzy Numbers |
111 |
|
|
3.3 Defuzzification Methods |
112 |
|
|
3.3.1 Center of Gravity (COG) |
112 |
|
|
3.3.2 Bisector of Area (BOA) |
113 |
|
|
4 Expressing Time with Fuzzy Numbers |
113 |
|
|
4.1 Forming the Time Matrices |
115 |
|
|
5 Evaluation Metrics |
116 |
|
|
5.1 Average Gained Time I |
116 |
|
|
5.2 Average Gained Time II |
117 |
|
|
5.3 Average Gained Time III |
118 |
|
|
5.4 Defuzzification |
119 |
|
|
6 E-government Adoption Across the Balkans |
119 |
|
|
6.1 Sophistication Stage of Services |
119 |
|
|
6.2 Citizen Services |
121 |
|
|
6.3 Business Services |
122 |
|
|
6.4 Discussion |
122 |
|
|
7 Future Research Directions |
124 |
|
|
8 Conclusions |
125 |
|
|
References |
125 |
|
|
6 A Challenging E-journey Along the Silk Road: Lessons Learned from E-governments in China and India |
128 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
129 |
|
|
2 Role in Development |
130 |
|
|
3 Factors for a Successful E-government |
131 |
|
|
3.1 info Dev and E-government in Developing Countries |
132 |
|
|
3.2 Heeks' Design-Reality Gap Model |
133 |
|
|
4 Case Studies on China and India |
133 |
|
|
4.1 China |
134 |
|
|
4.1.1 The Success of Beijing's Business E-park |
134 |
|
|
4.1.2 Nanhai's District-Level E-government |
136 |
|
|
4.1.3 Comparative Analysis of Beijing and Nanhai |
136 |
|
|
4.2 India |
137 |
|
|
4.2.1 Success of Bhoomi |
138 |
|
|
4.2.2 Failure of Gyandoot |
139 |
|
|
4.2.3 Impact, Analysis, and Comparison |
141 |
|
|
4.2.4 Analysis and Comparison |
142 |
|
|
5 Overall Summary |
149 |
|
|
References |
149 |
|
|
7 Digital Government in North America: A Comparative Analysis of Policy and Program Priorities in Canada, Mexico, and the United States |
152 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
153 |
|
|
2 Understanding Digital Government |
153 |
|
|
3 Research Design and Methods |
155 |
|
|
4 Country Overviews |
156 |
|
|
4.1 Mexico |
156 |
|
|
4.2 Canada |
157 |
|
|
4.3 The United States |
158 |
|
|
4.4 Comparing the Three Countries |
159 |
|
|
5 Understanding Digital Government Related Priorities in the Three Countries of North America |
159 |
|
|
5.1 Objectives |
159 |
|
|
5.1.1 Comparing the Three Countries |
161 |
|
|
5.2 Strategies |
162 |
|
|
5.2.1 Comparing the Three Countries |
163 |
|
|
5.3 Projects |
163 |
|
|
5.3.1 Comparing the Three Countries |
165 |
|
|
5.4 Budget Priorities |
166 |
|
|
5.4.1 Comparing the Three Countries |
166 |
|
|
5.5 IT Governance |
167 |
|
|
5.5.1 Comparing the Three Countries |
168 |
|
|
6 Final Remarks |
168 |
|
|
References |
171 |
|
|
8 Adoption of Web 2.0 by Canadian and US Governments |
174 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
174 |
|
|
2 Theoretical Overview |
177 |
|
|
3 Methodology |
179 |
|
|
3.1 Evolution of Web 2.0 |
179 |
|
|
3.2 How Is Web 2.0 Different from Web 1.0? |
180 |
|
|
3.3 Rationale and Definitions for Comparable Web 2.0 Technologies |
181 |
|
|
4 Results |
183 |
|
|
4.1 How Are Canadian Government Agencies Adopting Web 2.0? |
183 |
|
|
4.2 How Are US Government Agencies Adopting Web 2.0? |
184 |
|
|
5 Discussion and Comparison of Adoption of Web 2.0 by Canadian and US Governments |
187 |
|
|
6 Recommendations |
188 |
|
|
7 Conclusions |
192 |
|
|
References |
193 |
|
|
9 E-government and Federalism in Italy and CanadaA Comparative Assessment |
195 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
195 |
|
|
2 Political and Fiscal Federalism in Canada and Italy |
197 |
|
|
2.1 Canada |
198 |
|
|
2.2 Italy |
200 |
|
|
3 Co-ordinating E-government Across Jurisdictions |
201 |
|
|
3.1 Canada |
201 |
|
|
3.2 Italy |
204 |
|
|
4 Comparative Assessment |
207 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
209 |
|
|
References |
210 |
|
|
10 Adoption of E-government by Disadvantaged Groupsin the United States and the United Kingdom |
212 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
212 |
|
|
2 Internet and E-government Usage by Disadvantaged Groups |
214 |
|
|
2.1 UK |
214 |
|
|
2.2 US |
215 |
|
|
3 Barriers to Internet Use |
216 |
|
|
4 Legal Requirements and Policy Guidance on Web Accessibility |
217 |
|
|
4.1 UK |
217 |
|
|
4.1.1 Legal Requirements in UK |
217 |
|
|
4.2 The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines |
218 |
|
|
4.3 US |
218 |
|
|
4.3.1 Section 508 Legislation |
218 |
|
|
4.3.2 The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA], 1990 |
219 |
|
|
5 How Accessible Are Government Web Sites? |
219 |
|
|
5.1 UK |
220 |
|
|
5.1.1 Accessibility of Central Government Web Sites |
220 |
|
|
5.1.2 Accessibility of Local Government Web Sites |
220 |
|
|
5.2 US |
220 |
|
|
5.2.1 Accessibility of Federal Government Web Sites |
220 |
|
|
5.2.2 Accessibility of State Web Sites |
221 |
|
|
6 Policies and Initiatives |
221 |
|
|
6.1 UK |
221 |
|
|
6.1.1 UK Online Centers |
222 |
|
|
6.1.2 Myguide |
222 |
|
|
6.1.3 UK Online Centers and E-government |
222 |
|
|
6.1.4 Home Internet Access |
223 |
|
|
6.1.5 Community Projects |
223 |
|
|
6.1.6 Digital Literacy |
224 |
|
|
6.1.7 Improving Web Usability |
224 |
|
|
6.2 US |
224 |
|
|
6.2.1 Public Libraries |
225 |
|
|
6.2.2 City-Wide Broadband and Digital Inclusion Strategies |
225 |
|
|
6.2.3 Improving Web Usability |
226 |
|
|
7 Conclusions |
227 |
|
|
References |
228 |
|
|
11 Implementing E-Government LocallyAn Empirical Survey from the European Metropolitan Area Rhine-Neckar |
232 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
232 |
|
|
2 A Definition of (European) Metropolitan Areas |
235 |
|
|
3 Setup and Research Methodology |
238 |
|
|
4 Results |
241 |
|
|
5 Discussion: Interpretations and Limitations of the Results |
243 |
|
|
6 Summary and Conclusion |
245 |
|
|
References |
246 |
|
|
Part II Country Case Studies |
249 |
|
|
12 E-government Adoption Landscape Zambia: Context, Issues, and Challenges |
250 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
250 |
|
|
2 Conceptual Framework of E-government |
253 |
|
|
2.1 E-government Maturity Models |
253 |
|
|
2.2 Issues and Challenges for E-government Implementation |
253 |
|
|
3 E-government Adoption Models |
256 |
|
|
4 E-government Adoption in Zambia |
258 |
|
|
4.1 Issues Status of Citizen E-government Adoption in Zambia |
258 |
|
|
4.2 Regulatory and Institutional Frameworks |
260 |
|
|
4.3 Regulatory and Institutional Frameworks Suggested E-government Adoption Model for Zambia |
261 |
|
|
5 Future Trends |
263 |
|
|
6 Conclusions |
264 |
|
|
References |
265 |
|
|
13 Challenges of Effective E-governance: Problems of Transparency, Infrastructure, and Connectivity in Kenya |
268 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
268 |
|
|
2 Background |
269 |
|
|
2.1 Kenya: A Brief History |
271 |
|
|
2.2 Anglo-leasing Scandal and Kibaki's Reform |
272 |
|
|
3 E-governance in Kenya: Equal to the Task? |
273 |
|
|
3.1 Seeking Transparency |
275 |
|
|
3.2 M-PESA---Mobile Money Transfer |
276 |
|
|
3.3 Infrastructure, Penetration, and Connectivity |
277 |
|
|
3.4 Discussions and Recommendations |
279 |
|
|
4 Future Research Directions |
279 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
280 |
|
|
References |
280 |
|
|
14 The Politics of E-government in Spain: Between Recent Innovations and Old Inertias |
283 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
283 |
|
|
2 The First Steps of Computerization in Spanish Central Government |
285 |
|
|
3 Basic Attributes of E-government in Spain |
288 |
|
|
3.1 Strategy |
289 |
|
|
3.2 Europeanization |
291 |
|
|
3.3 Organizational Structure |
292 |
|
|
3.4 People |
293 |
|
|
3.5 ICTs Management Norms and Regulation |
294 |
|
|
3.6 Electronic Certification and Identification Policy |
296 |
|
|
4 The Social Demand for E-services and Public Opinion About E-government |
296 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
302 |
|
|
References |
303 |
|
|
15 Technological Adoption of a Privatised E-government: Implications for Democracy and Socially Marginalised Communities in Brazil |
306 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
306 |
|
|
2 The Services Improvement Agenda in Brazil |
308 |
|
|
3 The Privatisation of Telecommunications in Brazil |
312 |
|
|
4 The Relationships Improvement Agenda |
314 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
316 |
|
|
References |
316 |
|
|
16 The Challenges of E-governance in a Small, Developing Society: The Case of Trinidad and Tobago |
319 |
|
|
1 Country Background |
319 |
|
|
2 Reform of the Public Sector in Trinidad and Tobago and the Introduction of New Public Management |
320 |
|
|
3 The First Phase in the Introduction of E-governance in Trinidad and TobagoIntroducing E-government |
323 |
|
|
4 Some of the Challenges to E-government in Trinidad and Tobago |
325 |
|
|
4.1 The Introduction of Policy |
325 |
|
|
4.2 Funding |
328 |
|
|
4.3 Fragmentation of ICT Units and the Lethargy of the Public Sector |
330 |
|
|
4.4 Private-Sector Partnerships |
331 |
|
|
4.5 Digital Access |
333 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
334 |
|
|
References |
334 |
|
|
17 Towards E-government Transformation in Turkey: Policy and Implementation |
336 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
336 |
|
|
2 The Concept of E-government |
337 |
|
|
3 E-government in Turkey |
339 |
|
|
3.1 E-government Studies and Projects in Turkey's Ministries |
341 |
|
|
3.1.1 Ministry of Justice |
341 |
|
|
3.1.2 Ministry of National Defence |
341 |
|
|
3.1.3 Ministry of Internal Affairs |
342 |
|
|
3.1.4 Ministry of Finance |
344 |
|
|
3.1.5 Ministry of National Education |
345 |
|
|
3.1.6 Ministry of Labor and Social Security |
346 |
|
|
3.2 E-government Studies and Project in Turkey's Local Governments |
347 |
|
|
3.2.1 Special Provincial Administrations |
347 |
|
|
3.2.2 Municipalities |
347 |
|
|
3.3 Turkish E-government Analyses with the Statistics |
348 |
|
|
4 E-governments Problems in Turkey |
353 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
355 |
|
|
References |
356 |
|
|
18 Measuring E-government Adoption by Governments:The Greek Case |
358 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
358 |
|
|
2 Background |
361 |
|
|
3 The Greek Case |
363 |
|
|
4 Investigating E-government Adoption in Greece |
365 |
|
|
5 Conclusions and Future Research |
369 |
|
|
Appendix 2 |
373 |
|
|
References |
373 |
|
|
19 Critical Factors for Adoption of E-government: Validityof Adoption Model in Indian Context |
376 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
377 |
|
|
2 E-government in India |
378 |
|
|
3 Theoretical Framework |
379 |
|
|
4 Research Methodology |
382 |
|
|
4.1 Sample Selection and Data Collection |
382 |
|
|
4.2 Statistical Analysis |
384 |
|
|
4.3 Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) |
384 |
|
|
4.4 Reliability and Multicollinearity Assessment |
388 |
|
|
4.5 Regression Analysis |
389 |
|
|
5 Results and Discussion |
390 |
|
|
6 Conclusions and Future Research Directions |
392 |
|
|
References |
392 |
|
|
20 Conceptualizing and Implementation of E-government in India |
395 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
395 |
|
|
2 Method |
397 |
|
|
3 Conceptualization of E-government in India |
397 |
|
|
3.1 Political Factors |
398 |
|
|
3.2 Infrastructural Factors |
398 |
|
|
3.3 Familiarity Factors |
399 |
|
|
4 The E-government Plan |
400 |
|
|
4.1 Key Components |
400 |
|
|
4.2 Mission Mode Projects |
402 |
|
|
5 Implementing the E-government Plan |
403 |
|
|
5.1 Funding the Plan |
403 |
|
|
5.2 Institutional Setup for Implementation |
403 |
|
|
5.3 Role of the Private Sector |
404 |
|
|
6 Analysis and Status |
405 |
|
|
7 Barriers to E-government in India |
406 |
|
|
8 Impact Assessment |
407 |
|
|
9 Conclusion |
408 |
|
|
References |
409 |
|
|
21 E-government in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus |
412 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
412 |
|
|
1.1 Importance of the E-government Concept |
413 |
|
|
1.2 Country Background Information |
414 |
|
|
1.3 Reasons for Considering the Case of Northern Cyprus |
415 |
|
|
2 E-government in Cyprus |
416 |
|
|
3 Reasons for E-government Adoption |
418 |
|
|
4 Organization of E-government in Northern Cyprus |
419 |
|
|
4.1 Organizational Structure |
420 |
|
|
4.2 Legal Infrastructure for E-government |
420 |
|
|
4.3 Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Government Websites |
421 |
|
|
4.3.1 Central Government Websites |
422 |
|
|
4.3.2 Local Government Websites |
422 |
|
|
5 Evaluation and Conclusion |
423 |
|
|
5.1 Challenges and Future Issues |
423 |
|
|
5.2 Recommendations and Conclusions |
424 |
|
|
References |
425 |
|
|
22 SCRANs Development of a Trans-national Comparator for the Standardisation of E-government Services |
427 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
427 |
|
|
2 The Academic Networking of Smartcities |
428 |
|
|
2.1 SCRAN as a Three-Way Partnership |
428 |
|
|
2.2 Brief Overview of the Triple Helix |
428 |
|
|
2.3 SCRAN's Take on the Triple Helix |
430 |
|
|
2.4 Configuring the SmartCities Triple Helix |
431 |
|
|
2.5 The Step-Wise Logic |
431 |
|
|
2.6 Inverting the Normal Representation and ''Turning Things Upside Down'' |
433 |
|
|
3 Reaching Above the Baseline |
435 |
|
|
3.1 The Question of Measurement |
435 |
|
|
3.2 The Trans-national Comparator |
436 |
|
|
3.3 The Standardisation of eGov Services |
437 |
|
|
3.4 Transformative Business-to-Citizen Applications Across the North Sea |
439 |
|
|
4 The Network |
440 |
|
|
4.1 The Shared Enterprise and Joint Venture |
441 |
|
|
4.2 The Workspaces |
442 |
|
|
4.3 Web-Services |
442 |
|
|
4.4 Main Areas of the Site |
444 |
|
|
5 Conclusions |
446 |
|
|
References |
447 |
|
|
Part III Innovations and Emerging Technologies |
449 |
|
|
23 Public Participation Geographic Information Systems:A Literature Survey |
450 |
|
|
1 PPGISAn Overview |
451 |
|
|
2 Evolution of PPGIS Technology |
453 |
|
|
2.1 Traditional Desktop-Based GIS |
453 |
|
|
2.2 Web GIS |
453 |
|
|
2.3 Geospatial Web 2.0 platforms |
454 |
|
|
3 PPGIS Themes |
455 |
|
|
3.1 Significance of Context |
456 |
|
|
3.2 Technical GIS Concerns |
457 |
|
|
3.3 Institutional Structure of Participatory Decision-Making Processes |
459 |
|
|
3.4 Empowerment |
461 |
|
|
4 Conclusion |
462 |
|
|
References |
463 |
|
|
24 Learning with GIS-Based Monitors in the Netherlands |
468 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
468 |
|
|
2 GIS-Based Monitoring |
469 |
|
|
3 Theoretical Framework |
471 |
|
|
3.1 Rational Approach |
471 |
|
|
3.2 Political Approach |
472 |
|
|
3.3 Cultural Approach |
472 |
|
|
3.4 Research Strategy |
473 |
|
|
4 Empirical Findings |
473 |
|
|
4.1 The Case-Studies |
473 |
|
|
4.2 Current Functions of GIS-Based Monitors |
474 |
|
|
4.2.1 Rational Function: Location-Based Signals |
474 |
|
|
4.2.2 Political Function: Making Policy Implementation Transparent |
475 |
|
|
4.2.3 Cultural Function: Sharing the Same Images |
475 |
|
|
4.3 Learning Conditions |
475 |
|
|
4.3.1 Rational Learning Conditions |
475 |
|
|
4.3.2 Political Learning Conditions |
476 |
|
|
4.3.3 Cultural Learning Conditions |
476 |
|
|
4.4 Learning Barriers |
476 |
|
|
4.4.1 Rational Learning Barriers |
476 |
|
|
4.4.2 Political Learning Barriers |
477 |
|
|
4.4.3 Cultural Learning Barriers |
478 |
|
|
4.5 Learning Levels |
478 |
|
|
4.5.1 Rational Learning Levels |
478 |
|
|
4.5.2 Political Learning Levels |
479 |
|
|
4.5.3 Cultural Learning Levels |
479 |
|
|
5 Conclusions and Recommendations |
479 |
|
|
5.1 Functions of GIS-Based Monitors |
479 |
|
|
5.2 Learning Conditions |
480 |
|
|
5.3 Learning Barriers |
480 |
|
|
5.4 Levels of Learning |
480 |
|
|
5.5 Recommendations |
480 |
|
|
References |
482 |
|
|
25 Bridging the Other Divide: An Assessment of the Usability of Trinidad and Tobago Government Ministry Websites |
484 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
484 |
|
|
1.1 The Other Divide and Website Usability |
485 |
|
|
2 Methodology |
486 |
|
|
2.1 Website Usability: Dimensions and Variables |
487 |
|
|
3 Findings |
491 |
|
|
3.1 Overview |
491 |
|
|
3.1.1 Best Practice Sites |
492 |
|
|
3.1.2 Usability Feature Assessments |
493 |
|
|
3.2 Navigation |
495 |
|
|
3.3 Legitimacy |
496 |
|
|
3.4 Information Architecture |
497 |
|
|
3.5 Accessibility Accommodations |
497 |
|
|
4 Usability Distributions of the Pilot Portal Site Relative to the Two Best Practice Ministry Sites |
498 |
|
|
5 Conclusion and Future Implications |
500 |
|
|
5.1 Future Implications |
502 |
|
|
Appendix |
503 |
|
|
References |
503 |
|
|
26 E-government in New Zealand: Local Governments, Digital Divides and the National Digital Strategy |
506 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
506 |
|
|
2 New Zealands National Digital Strategy |
507 |
|
|
3 Marginalised New Zealanders |
511 |
|
|
3.1 Digital Divide |
512 |
|
|
3.2 E-government and User Issues for Marginalised New Zealanders |
512 |
|
|
4 Theoretical Framework |
513 |
|
|
4.1 Social Informatics |
513 |
|
|
4.2 Boundary Conditions and Marginalisation |
513 |
|
|
4.3 Uncertainty |
514 |
|
|
4.4 An E-readiness Maturity Model for Local Governments in New Zealand |
514 |
|
|
5 Research Method Part 1 |
515 |
|
|
5.1 Data Analysis: Part 1 |
515 |
|
|
6 DiscussionLocal Government Websites |
516 |
|
|
7 Research Method Part 2 |
517 |
|
|
8 DiscussionHypothetical Cases |
517 |
|
|
8.1 Case 1: Multiple Disabilities |
517 |
|
|
8.2 Case 2: Intellectually Impaired |
518 |
|
|
8.3 Case 3: Homeless |
519 |
|
|
8.4 Case 4: Elderly |
519 |
|
|
8.5 Digital Divides, Local Governments and Marginalised People |
520 |
|
|
9 Recommendations |
521 |
|
|
10 Conclusions |
521 |
|
|
References |
522 |
|
|
27 A Study of E-government and Political Indicators in Developing Nations with and Without Access-to-Information Laws |
526 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
526 |
|
|
2 Literature Review |
528 |
|
|
3 Data and Findings |
530 |
|
|
4 Discussion |
538 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
540 |
|
|
References |
541 |
|
|
28 Socializing E-governance: A Parallel Study of Participatory E-governance and Emerging Social Media |
544 |
|
|
1 The Landscape of E-participation |
544 |
|
|
1.1 Defining Citizen Participation and E-participation |
544 |
|
|
1.2 Citizen Participation and E-participation Taxonomies |
545 |
|
|
1.3 E-participation State of Play |
546 |
|
|
1.4 Critical Factors for E-participation |
547 |
|
|
1.5 Barriers to E-participation |
548 |
|
|
1.6 A Synthesis of Key Recommendations for E-participation Projects |
550 |
|
|
2 Social Media for E-governance and E-participation: An Overview |
552 |
|
|
2.1 The Advent and Potential of Social Media |
552 |
|
|
2.2 Participatory Budgeting |
555 |
|
|
2.3 Problem Reporting and Follow-Up |
555 |
|
|
2.4 Gathering Citizens' Views and Concerns |
556 |
|
|
2.5 Uncovering Public Sector Information |
557 |
|
|
3 Concluding Remarks |
558 |
|
|
References |
559 |
|
|
29 E-government, Accountability, and Performance:Best-in-Class Governments in European Union Countries |
561 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
561 |
|
|
2 Accountability, Performance, and E-government |
562 |
|
|
2.1 Definition of Accountability |
563 |
|
|
2.2 Definition of Performance in the Public Sector |
564 |
|
|
2.3 How E-government May Affect Accountability and Performance |
565 |
|
|
3 E-government Development in the Public Sector |
567 |
|
|
3.1 The Evolution of E-government in European Union |
567 |
|
|
3.2 EU's Strategies and Actors for E-government |
568 |
|
|
3.3 E-government European Outputs |
569 |
|
|
4 The Influence of E-government on Accountability and Performance |
570 |
|
|
5 Conclusion |
576 |
|
|
Appendix |
576 |
|
|
Austria [1] |
576 |
|
|
Portugal [4] |
577 |
|
|
The United Kingdom [5] |
578 |
|
|
France [6] |
579 |
|
|
Sweden [7] |
579 |
|
|
Norway [9] |
580 |
|
|
Germany [10] |
581 |
|
|
Spain [11] |
582 |
|
|
The Netherlands [12] |
583 |
|
|
Italy [16] |
584 |
|
|
References |
585 |
|
|
30 The OECD Budgetary Transparency: An Examinationof Online Budgetary Information Across EuropeanUnion Countries |
587 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
588 |
|
|
2 Differences in Public Administration Styles in Europe |
589 |
|
|
3 International Experiences for Fiscal and Budget Transparency: OECD Recommendations on Best Practices for Budget Transparency |
592 |
|
|
4 Empirical Research |
594 |
|
|
4.1 Description of the Research Methodology |
594 |
|
|
4.2 Study Sample |
596 |
|
|
4.3 Results Analysis |
597 |
|
|
5 Conclusions |
601 |
|
|
References |
613 |
|
|
31 Does Size or Geography Matter? Empirical Analysisof Finnish Local Government Services on the Internet |
615 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
615 |
|
|
2 Broad and Narrow Issues in E-service Provision |
616 |
|
|
3 Content Framework and Questions |
620 |
|
|
4 Empirical Evidence |
624 |
|
|
4.1 Context, Data and Methods |
624 |
|
|
4.2 Results |
626 |
|
|
5 Conclusions |
630 |
|
|
Appendix |
632 |
|
|
References |
635 |
|
|
32 E-government Interoperability Framework: A Case Study in a Developing Country |
638 |
|
|
1 Introduction |
639 |
|
|
2 Interoperability Frameworks |
640 |
|
|
3 Interoperability in Developing Countries: Risks and Opportunities |
643 |
|
|
4 An Analysis of ICT Initiatives in Mozambique |
645 |
|
|
5 The e-GIF4M: The Approach |
645 |
|
|
6 Technical Implementation |
646 |
|
|
6.1 The e-GIF4M Service Delivery Architecture |
646 |
|
|
6.2 Technical Standards |
648 |
|
|
7 Organizational Implementation |
650 |
|
|
7.1 Supporting the Development of the Interoperability Framework |
650 |
|
|
7.2 E-GIF4M Interoperability Maturity Model |
651 |
|
|
7.3 Keeping the E-GIF4M Healthy |
654 |
|
|
8 The Plan |
655 |
|
|
8.1 Integration in the E-GIF4M Platform |
656 |
|
|
8.2 Systemic Actions |
657 |
|
|
9 Next Steps |
658 |
|
|
10 Conclusions |
658 |
|
|
References |
659 |
|
|
Index |
662 |
|