|
Contents |
8 |
|
|
Preface |
10 |
|
|
Acknowledgements |
12 |
|
|
On Cloning: An Introduction |
14 |
|
|
WHAT IS CLONING? |
15 |
|
|
EMBRYO SPLITTING |
16 |
|
|
NUCLEAR REPLACEMENT |
18 |
|
|
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS |
19 |
|
|
TECHNICAL PROBLEMS |
24 |
|
|
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE |
26 |
|
|
WHY, DESPITE THE PROBLEMS, WE MUST PURSUE RESEARCH WHICH USES CNR |
29 |
|
|
THE REACTION TO THE BIRTH OF DOLLY |
32 |
|
|
WHY HAS CLONING PROVED SUCH A SEDUCTIVE IDEA? |
35 |
|
|
NINE CASES |
44 |
|
|
Human Dignity and Reproductive Autonomy |
47 |
|
|
HUMAN DIGNITY |
47 |
|
|
GOD – THE GREATEST CLONING TECHNOLOGIST |
48 |
|
|
INSTRUMENTALISATION |
52 |
|
|
AUTONOMY AGAIN |
61 |
|
|
GENETIC VARIABILITY |
63 |
|
|
MORAL NOSE |
65 |
|
|
IS IT POSSIBLE TO BE TOO REASONABLE? |
67 |
|
|
DOES THE LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE TO DOLLY CONSTITUTE AN ATTACK ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DIGNITY? |
68 |
|
|
PROCREATIVE AUTONOMY AND THE RIGHT TO FOUND A FAMILY |
70 |
|
|
JOHN ROBERTSON |
76 |
|
|
The Welfare of the Child |
80 |
|
|
THE PERSONAL QUESTION |
81 |
|
|
THE GENERAL QUESTION |
82 |
|
|
1. PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS |
82 |
|
|
2. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS |
85 |
|
|
3. THE GENERAL AND THE PERSONAL IN THE BRAZIER REPORT AND THE HFE ACT |
86 |
|
|
4. PROCREATIVE AUTONOMY |
88 |
|
|
SOME NEW ARGUMENTS FROM ONORA O’NEILL |
90 |
|
|
CONFUSED RELATIONSHIPS |
91 |
|
|
AMBIGUOUS RELATIONSHIPS |
94 |
|
|
SUB-OPTIMAL PARENTING |
97 |
|
|
THE NON-IDENTITY PROBLEM |
99 |
|
|
INSTRUMENTALISATION AND CHILD WELFARE |
101 |
|
|
A FAIRYTALE |
101 |
|
|
THE RIGHT TO AN OPEN FUTURE |
102 |
|
|
HIGH EXPECTATIONS AND NO ‘OPEN FUTURE’ |
104 |
|
|
SOCIETAL PREJUDICE AND RESPECT FOR CLONES |
105 |
|
|
Safety and Danger |
107 |
|
|
1. SAFETY |
107 |
|
|
2. SAFETY |
122 |
|
|
Therapeutic Cloning and Stem Cell Research and Therapy |
126 |
|
|
WHAT IS THERAPEUTIC CLONING? |
126 |
|
|
1. WHAT ARE THE ETHICAL ISSUES? |
127 |
|
|
2. WHY EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS? |
129 |
|
|
3. STEM CELL RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY |
132 |
|
|
4. THE ETHICS OF STEM CELL RESEARCH |
138 |
|
|
1. LESSONS FROM SEXUAL REPRODUCTION |
141 |
|
|
2. CONSISTENCY WITH ATTITUDES TO AND MORAL BELIEFS ABOUT ABORTION AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTION |
154 |
|
|
3. THE PRINCIPLE OF WASTE AVOIDANCE |
155 |
|
|
Conclusion |
156 |
|
|
HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE CLONING – SAFETY ISSUES |
157 |
|
|
THERAPEUTIC CLONING – SAFETY ISSUES |
158 |
|
|
Notes |
160 |
|
|
Bibliography |
178 |
|
|
Index |
190 |
|
|
More eBooks at www.ciando.com |
0 |
|